Work Expert (WE) is an independent publishing and referral website. We are not a recruiter, hiring manager, agent or employer, and we are not affiliated with or endorsed by micro1. Applying takes you to the platform's own website, where we may be recorded as the referring source. We may receive a referral fee at no additional cost to you. Read our full affiliate disclosure →
About the Role
micro1 is engaging Physics Experts (Postdoc / Junior professor) to participate in a high-impact project supporting a customer in the science and technology sector. In this role, you'll apply your expertise to help train next-generation AI systems. Your work will shape how models learn, reason, and perform through high-quality, real-world input. No prior experience in AI is required - your domain knowledge is what matters. • Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical arguments generated by researc
What You'll Do
Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical arguments generated by researchers or AI platforms.
Detect errors, unjustified steps, missing assumptions, dimensional inconsistencies, and weaknesses in logic or methodology.
Delineate between substantive scientific issues and styl
Engaged directly through micro1. Apply via the link below - micro1 handles onboarding and payment.
Common Questions
micro1 has a reliability rating of reliable based on the listings we track, with an onboarding time of 1-3 days. See our full micro1 review for the details behind that rating.
Applying takes you to micro1's own website, where the application is completed. We are not a recruiter or employer and do not process applications directly - we may be recorded as the referring source.
$80-$150/h - Engaged directly through micro1. Apply via the link below - micro1 handles onboarding and payment.
Critically evaluate and review physics solutions, mathematical derivations, and theoretical arguments generated by researchers or AI platforms. Detect errors, unjustified steps, missing assumptions, dimensional inconsistencies, and weaknesses in logic or methodology. Delineate between substantive scientific issues and styl
